The Business Hunters · OpiniãoStrategy, leadership and execution
Authored commentary

An objection can improve a founder's first experiment

Lucas Atanazio · 2 October 2026
ASSUMPTION → TEST → DECISION
Concept diagram for the analysis; no measured data are represented.

An early business proposal can become difficult to examine when every objection is heard as a challenge to the founder's ambition. Lucas Atanazio, entrepreneur and founder of ATNZO, offers a different approach in this authored commentary: use the strongest objection to shape a practical test.

“A worried relative is not automatically an opponent of the project. A prospective customer who declines an offer is not necessarily someone who failed to understand it. Listen for the cost, inconvenience or alternative that your enthusiasm may have left out.”

“You do not need complete certainty before starting. You need to understand which decision you are making and how much room it leaves to change direction. Testing access to customers can be a different commitment from building the full operation.”

“Write down one concrete reason the proposal might fail and an action that could investigate it. If delivery is the uncertainty, rehearse delivery. If distribution is the uncertainty, examine how a real customer would find and evaluate the offer.”

This approach treats disagreement as potentially useful information while leaving the decision with the founder. It does not make every criticism correct. Its purpose is to turn a vague argument about courage into a clearer discussion of assumptions, commitments and what to learn next.

Background sources